IL-2: Battle of Moscow Full Review

It’s been a week since the final release of IL-2: Battle of Moscow and I thought it was long past time for my review. I’m going to break it up into several pieces and review each piece independently with an overall score at the end.

Visit the Battlefields UK server blog for my original IL-2: Battle of Stalingrad review.

Initial Impressions and Content

If you have played 1C Game Studios’ excellent IL-2: Battle of Stalingrad already then the Battle of Moscow update will be no surprise in either its format or content. The same overall user profile, menu system, campaign, multiplayer and quick mission setup is essentially intact with minor changes and updates that have been rolled out cumulatively over time.

bom-me109inthehangar
The Battle of Moscow hangar is a familiar place.
Battle of Moscow launches with some key pieces of content:

  • One 290km x 270km map of the Moscow region with both late autumn and winter terrain sets
  • Ten new aircraft – Eight featured in the normal product and two as premium aircraft
  • One new 5-chapter single player campaign

The aircraft lineup is as follows:

  • I-16 Type 24
  • MiG-3
  • IL-2 Model 1941
  • Pe-2 Series 35
  • Bf109E-7
  • Bf109F-2
  • Bf110E-2
  • Ju88A-4

These are all included in the regular package. If you’re looking to gather up the complete set then the two Premium aircraft are:

  • P-40E-1
  • MC.202 Series VIII

The aircraft lineup is essential to get right and, like Battle of Stalingrad before it, Battle of Moscow chooses key aircraft that really benefit the whole line-up.

I was worried that after Battle of Stalingrad we would go forward with the series into the next battle and that we would loose the opportunity to fly some iconic earlier types. Fortunately, the developers picked a key battle that let us experience all of those things. The MiG-3, I-16, Ju88, Bf109 Emil and Bf110 are great aircraft to have featured. We also get earlier versions of aircraft we have already which may seem like a shortcut but that is not the case here – The Bf109F-2 is distinct in its own right and amazingly has that subtly different feel from the later F-4 we already had.

The Premium aircraft are a mixed bag but I have to side with the developers. They are aircraft that fit in from a performance standpoint and add to both Stalingrad and Moscow scenarios fairly well and they offer an opportunity to get into an iconic aircraft that might not otherwise be available.

bom-p40looksgreat
The P-40 is the quintessential American styled pursuit aircraft of the early 1940s.
The P-40 is one of the quintessential American built aircraft of the early 1940s and the MC.202 is likewise highly recognizable as an Italian thoroughbred of a fighter. Neither fit the Moscow scenario ideally (the P-40B would have been a better fit) and the MC.202s appearance at Stalingrad was incredibly short… But having them is fun. They are collector’s items and perhaps the most important part here is that they don’t cause an imbalance in the aircraft lineup. 1CGS can not be accused of forcing players of paying to win.

Would more aircraft be nice? Absolutely. The earlier editions of the Yak-1 and LaGG-3 are sorely missed in my mind and the Ju52 is still the only non-combat aircraft present. Observer and transport aircraft, even if non-flyable, would be nice to have aircraft types in the future. They would add variety above and beyond the current 10 types in Moscow and 20 types overall.

The real benefit of the current model of development (should it stay unchanged in the future) is that improvements made to the sequel/add-on have direct positive impacts on the original. Battle of Stalingrad is not the same product that was released and periodic updates to that product have added new features and enhanced fidelity. Better atmospheric effects? Updated across both products. Improved map markings and rendering? Updated across both. Flight model revisions and 64-bit performance improvements? Updated across both. You might sense a trend here.

Score: 8/10

Graphics and Performance

The visuals in the new IL-2 series are stunning. They are probably some of the best looking aircraft around and Battle of Moscow adds new atmospheric effects including realistic sunset and sunrise, realistic night skies, beautiful reflections and fogging effects.

il2-formation01
A formation of IL-2 with tracer fire in the background
Aircraft cockpits, exteriors and all of the mechanical animations that go along with it are excellently done with finely detailed textures and animations for all manners of activities in the cockpit – from adjusting the trim to setting fuel mixtures and hand raising/lowering landing gear. Textures are excellently detailed and its rare to find something that is blurry or out of place in the final release (in beta we found a few issues here and there).

Texture popping used to be an issue but the 64-bit update seems to have fixed that.

IL-2: Battle of Stalingrad and Battle of Moscow are performance hogs eating up as much CPU, GPU and RAM as you have to throw at them. A budget system will not be able to handle this. My experience has been much improved since upgrading my PC to a new Intel ‘Skylake’ based CPU, 8 GB of RAM and a GTX 960. But the biggest difference was actually the 64-bit update to the game engine itself. The IL-2 series runs better now than at any point in its past.

Take the developer system specs seriously if you are on the fence:

  • OS: 64-bit Windows®
  • CPU: Intel® Core™ 2 Quad 2.6 GHz+ or Intel® Core™ i5/i7 2.6 GHz+
  • GPU: 1024 Mb+, GeForce GTX 260+/Radeon HD5850+
  • RAM: 4 Gb+
  • Sound: DirectX 9.0c/11 compatible
  • Free Hard Drive space: 10 Gb+
  • Internet Connection Required for Registration, Campaign Mode, Multiplayer and Statistics Tracking. 256 Kb/s for single-player and 1 Mb/s for multiplayer

Score: 9/10

Flying, Sound, Weather and Simulation Fidelity

The thing that this series scores highest at is the overall cohesiveness of the flight model, sound, weather modelling and overall fidelity wrapped up into one.

Flight simulator developers have always been forced between two options. Model a single aircraft to extraordinary detail and force the player through detailed start-up procedures OR, offer a huge selection of aircraft. The current IL-2 series finds a high middle ground by offering excellent flight dynamics and high fidelity modeling but it makes getting into each aircraft fun and inviting without some of the tedium of start-up procedures.

I am not a pilot so I can’t lend my opinion in a scientific way to the accuracy of the flight model, however, the way that the aircraft feel is so much better than anything before. IL-2 Battle of Stalingrad set the standard and Battle of Moscow is more of the same. Aircraft feel alive and have much more personality in the air than in DCS.

Helping with the flying is the excellent sound design which is second to none in the simulator world. Some engine sounds could still be better but the overall system is excellent. Some issues with hit sounds not being heard are still present although to a lesser extent than before and most recent versions may have solved it altogether.

bom-109e-greatclouds
The lighting, weather and ground fog system in Battle of Moscow are stunning
The weather system is also very impressive with detail clouds in semi-realistic formations both look impressive and are essential to the flying experience. I’ve yet to see towering cumulonimbus done properly and they aren’t present here but then we haven’t yet had a summer scenario with which to truly experience those.

Wind and turbulence varies realistically at different altitudes and is another essential part of the sim. A full weather system with moving storm fronts and convective storm systems is not present but I don’t think that level of detail would necessarily add to the effect. The key parts of the experience are there and they are done incredibly well!

Overall this is where the whole thing comes together and the feeling and sound of flight are impressive.

Score: 10/10

Single Player Impressions

I’m primarily a single player person these days so having a good experience is essential. Battle of Moscow is similar to Battle of Stalingrad in that the single player experience feels flat and uninvolved.

bom-campaigns
Four chapters of my single player campaign experience are complete. Road to Rzhev is coming up next!
The theory behind the campaign system is sound – it lets a player jump in and experience what they want to experience with the time that they have on hand. For people with family obligations, this system is ideal (so is mid-mission pausing!). The system lets you choose aircraft, mission type, and then gives you the chance to choose from Normal and Expert difficulty modes and from a shortened flight or a full length flight – complete with takeoffs and landings.

Missions have a good level of variety, however, the same formula as before is still employed. Take off, head to waypoint, turn towards action point, head to an exit waypoint and then head for home base. Action tends to happen at each of these waypoints and rarely elsewhere. However, the Moscow and Stalingrad campaigns have gotten considerably better at throwing random events in and having some truly epic and memorable air combat experiences.

Battle of Moscow gets an extra bump out of the gate that Stalingrad didn’t – aircraft that saw service in both theaters. While this benefits the Stalingrad campaign to a greater extent, it also shows up here as you’ll find flights of Ju87, Bf109F-4, or He111.

Some campaign moments are also infuriating. A single Bf110 on a bomber interception mission should not happen. A squadron worth of interceptors up against a single He111 on a bombing run also shouldn’t happen. I can try and imagine the later as a photo recon run if only the bomber were not trying to drop bombs on a target.

The campaign needs more mission types. How about scramble missions? Tactical reconnaissance? Combat air patrol? I know if the right aircraft were available players would also enjoy artillery spotting (although I doubt I would find that interesting). Dynamix’s 1991 Aces of the Pacific had the right idea here in a system not that different from what is employed in modern day IL-2.

The campaign would ideally benefit from more historical squadron involvement (including skins and markings) and the option to choose from aircraft or proceed on a single career through a single type of aircraft.

bom-p40roughlanding
Damaged in combat, this P-40 noses over on landing. Look at the crumpled gear and propeller blades – Object physics in this game continue to impress.
Single player is also unfortunately the only place where you can gain access to all of the custom developer skins for the aircraft. Players with Premium access can unlock all of the equipment goodies.

Overall the experience is what you make of it. Some find it incredibly frustrating while others enjoy it. I do enjoy it but I sometimes wish it had some more.

Score: 6.5/10

Multiplayer

As with many games, multiplayer is what you make of it and in this case what the community makes of it. The second generation IL-2 has struggled to attract the kinds of servers and player numbers that truly make a thriving healthy community. In part that is the slow pickup among players of the new series.

bom-mp-interface
A typical multiplayer mission setup from the Wings of Liberty server.
Technically, the multiplayer in IL-2 is excellent. With a good connection and decent ping times the gameplay is excellent with only a few issues with warping and aircraft doing unusual things. I’ve been able to jump into a server and enjoy the game without worrying about the underlying technology for the most part. Definitely is a nice thing!

Some of the features work very well too. The ability for a mission creator to set aircraft numbers and modification availability is all there. Some servers have configured and scripted detail supply chains. A team that fails to defend their supply chain will suffer from fewer aircraft with the choice options sometimes not being available.

Mission objectives and the status of airfields under attack are great options here. Something sorely lacking from the original IL-2 and a great addition when Battle of Stalingrad came out. Tweaks have been made over time and this interface is better than ever.

You can also elect to join other pilots on their missions by becoming a gunner. It’s a great option to have!

bom-ju88gunner.jpg
Manning the gunner station on a Ju88.
The server browser is the weakest link here. It’s a barebones system of finding and connecting to servers. It works fine but it has none of the community options that HyperLobby (admittedly a third party option for the old IL-2) had. You also can’t look up server difficulty settings before joining. Unless you know the server or they write it in their description, you can never know what it is that you’re joining. There are also no friends lists and in the day and age of some very impressive online multiplayer games, this is sorely lacking.

Traditional co-op and more complex campaign co-op systems are not available in the new IL-2 series. There have been many discussions on how those may be created and 1CGS have stated unofficially that alternative multiplayer modes would be an interesting addition.

Joining an organized server event such as those put together by the Dedicated Bomber Squad (DBS) are great ways to have the same kind of co-op experience from the original IL-2. But it does require an extra level of organization not required by the original.

Overall, multiplayer is very good but it is also lacking in a few areas.

Score: 7/10

Conclusion

IL2: Battle of Moscow is a worthy addition to the IL-2 Sturmovik series following up the great work on Battle of Stalingrad with an equally comparable product that, together with the original, are greater than the sum of their parts. Combined with a strong community and what appears is ongoing developer support, the IL-2 series will hopefully have a bright future ahead of it.

bom-mig3-action-shot
A dramatic scene as a damaged MiG-3 scores a victory over a Bf109F-2.
Battle of Moscow retains some of the controversial elements that proved so divisive with Battle of Stalingrad. The unlock system being tied to Single Player campaign progress only is still a huge problem with the design of the game. I enjoy the unlock and campaign progression system as it gives me something to work through the missions for. I’m also a player of a great number of games that have used similar systems so it works for me. The biggest issue is not allowing multiplayer to open up the same possibilities as there are some players who play multiplayer only. Forcing them into a sometimes sterile and lackluster single player campaign experience is not the best move.

The campaign itself has a good structure but needs more depth to really become something good. At the moment it’s a more complex and randomized version of the quick mission generator. That’s ok… but it needs more. More squadron involvement, more player investment, and more mission type variety.

I give IL-2 Battle of Moscow an overall 8.5/10. Over a year ago, I reviewed IL-2 Battle of Stalingrad for Battlefield UK and gave it an 7.5/10 overall score. I stand by both numbers. Battle of Moscow, along with improvements to Battle of Stalingrad, bring the experience forward a few notches with more planes and more variety overall combined with technical and graphical improvements that also increase my enjoyment. It needs better single player elements and it needs a better multiplayer server browser – possibly with a chat system built in.

Battle of Moscow is hamstrung by some elements that still need refinement. It is, however, on the road to being the best World War II flight simulator ever created. In my mind it has the ability to surpass that of the original. A couple of additional expansions and further raising the bar on fidelity and gameplay elements will make this next generation sim into the legend that it deserves to be.

Overall Score: 8.5/10 (not an average)

Review update November 27, 2016: Since the release of Battle of Moscow final, the product has continued to undergo some significant changes and even larger changes are on the way for anyone who already owns the IL-2: Battle of Moscow or IL-2: Battle of Stalingrad product. Here are some of the changes:

  • The unlock system has been completely removed for owners of both Standard and Premium. Unlocks are now called “modifications” and are available to all.
  • Multiple performance improvements are on the way including an engine re-write in DX11. (coming December 2016)
  • Full VR support will arrive in 2017.
  • An entirely new campaign system based on the excellent one used in Rise of Flight will replace the current campaign system in IL-2: Battle of Moscow and Battle of Stalingrad. (coming sometime in 2017)

The state of the game continues to improve as shortcoming are redressed. Check out the rest of the blog for updates.

Image Gallery

Addendum

The one thing I did not get into in all of this is flight models. It’s a tough thing to review and be objective about. I’ve decided to steer clear of all of the FM debate for this review after having been in dozens of arguments over the years about this plane and that plane and so on.

The IL-2 series, with Battle of Moscow being the latest iteration, do an excellent job at aiming to have the kind of high fidelity that flight simulator pilots demand. Things tend to get complicated when it comes to the extreme levels of flight model examination.

This is what I can tell you. This is not War Thunder where the aircraft fly in a simplified fashion. IL-2 Battle of Stalingrad and Battle of Moscow definitely rival the excellent flight modeling of DCS – in some ways does it one better.

Advertisements

19 Comments Add yours

  1. Chris Reagan says:

    Are you smoking crack!??? How much are you getting paid to say IL-2 is anywhere near the quality of DCS? The IL-2 community is very small and very immature.. IL-2 is junk, its nowhere close to DCS. IL-2’s days are numbered. The maps are junk, the view distance is junk, the multiplayer aspect is broken and junk.. The aircraft selection is junk, the Russian aircraft are over modeled, and so many more issues. IL-2 is junk and doesn’t stand a chance to compete with DCS. Stop with your lies.. IL-2 BOS & BOM is just another huge let down in the IL-2 series of flight sims.. The Russian maps are soooo played out and insignificant.. Russia is yet again ruining this series.. Way to go.. All you fan boys need to get off the Russian Propaganda Wagon.. The quality of IL-2 is terrible.. The graphics engine is junk and the game overall is a huge let down.. The very, very small number of people who actual fly in IL-2 is proof of how bad IL-2 really is.. 2 ore 3 multiplayer servers in IL-2 is proof of how bad IL-2 is failing.. It’s dead in a year.. Another failure in the IL-2 series.. way to go

    Like

    1. ShamrockOneFive says:

      I think DCS is great but it has its issues and the biggest one for me is the consistency across the board. Some aircraft are super detailed and others are still being updated from what is essentially the LOMAC days. I’m pleased to see the effort is being put in but it does take an awful lot of time to see progress. DCS is extraordinarily complex so that is the trade-off.

      Respectfully, however, calling stuff junk doesn’t make it so. The biggest issue I’ll take with it is the maps – The maps that have been put together are incredibly detailed, they look beautiful, and I’d say the only map in DCS that is possibly better is Nevada (which is stunning) although its a tough call between the two.

      If they were paying me, I’d have said nicer things about BoM. As it is… it’s flawed but still a lot of fun.

      Like

  2. Infadel_macgee says:

    I can barely play a quick mission single player without the Sim freezing up solid ,control alt deleting almost every time now since the latest update .

    Like

    1. ShamrockOneFive says:

      I haven’t heard of too many issues from any of the IL-2: BoS/BoM related forums. It’s been almost (but not 100%) problem free for me since last year. I would definitely go through the IL-2 support page and contact one of their reps – they seem to take getting these issues fixed seriously from what I’ve heard.

      Good luck!

      IL-2 Support Page: http://il2sturmovik.com/support/

      Like

    2. tom43491 says:

      Have you tried validating files (if you have it through Steam)? Either that or Uninstaller and reinstalling. Could be corrupt files. I assume you are running the latest graphics drivers – but update those if you aren’t.

      Good luck!

      Like

  3. tom43491 says:

    Great article, and I have to agree on pretty much all points. I enjoy both DCS and IL-2.

    I find the DCS P-51D to be more thoroughly modeled – the clickable cockpit is amazing – Buuuut…. For the environment, immersion, damage modeling (for both players and AI – DCS AI seem able to fly under any condition that isn’t total wreckage), and overall feel I have to give it to IL-2. Maybe the new DCS engine and the Normandy 1942 map will change things and put DCS head and shoulders above anything else in all areas. But for a game, to be enjoyed for more than the sake of flying, IL-2 takes it, for me.

    Another point not to be taken lightly when comparing the two is that in IL-2 you are getting 8 planes for the price of one in DCS. So, the tradeoff is higher fidelity (presumably – I have never flown the real thing) in DCS. But right now with IL-2, I think you get a more complete package for a game, especially if you are comparing roughly an equal amount of money spent.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. ShamrockOneFive says:

      Thanks Tom! I think that’s a very balanced view you have there. DCS, IL-2 and others all tend to have their strengths and weaknesses. There’s a lot of appeal for all players out there to find the one that suits them best!

      Like

  4. Tom says:

    Great review, thanks!

    Overall, it’s great fun and feels realistic enough. It could be amplified a lot by re-integrating the mouse-cockpit interaction which was featured in IL2: CoD (unfortunately this title was never supported nor patched and had simplistic modelling, but it had so much potential). Coming from DCS, I don’t feel it’s lacking in any area,

    The biggest gripe I currently have with IL2: BoM is the difficulty level in campaign mode, you can only choose between “Normal” and “Expert”, without knowing what they actually represent. The “Normal” level is too simple, and I have no idea whether it is somewhat realistic regarding the plane systems and flight model. The Expert mode is quite hard to get into, in great part because of the navigation (that’s entirely personal and the limitation is mine), and the lack of communication with the airfield or flight (BoM is limited to very basic communication for the latter, nothing whatsoever for the former).

    Why there is still no custom mode is beyond me, it has been asked for a long time and this is apparently ignored by the developers, who stick with this basic settings in a complex simulation.

    The few planes does not bother me one bit, I’d rather have two aircraft which are well done that ten poorly modelled planes.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. ShamrockOneFive says:

      Thanks for your comments Tom! The Normal vs Expert in campaign is an issue and its similar to the complaints that have been made re: only a few simple graphics settings (Low, Medium, High and Ultra). Flight simmers tend to appreciate custom controls quite a bit more than the average gamer.

      Since Jason Williams has taken over as Producer, there have been comment towards seeing these items change and the campaign system is being overhauled. I’m sure that will change a great many minds.

      Like

  5. LawmanAUT says:

    Hi,

    nice article btw. Im a War Thunder and Rise of Flight pilot ( a bad one btw ) but I watch IL-2 on YT and Twitch regularely. First off all, that newest part of the IL-2 series looks AMAZING.

    But on the other side, paying 50,- for 8 planes, really? REALLY? Ok, now you can say if you buy some premium planes at both of my listed games, you have to pay 20-30,- too, for 1 plane.
    But I fear 4 planes/team is a bit boring with the time.
    So are there any news that they put more planes into the game ( I fear if yes its DLC ).

    Great review so far,
    cheers

    Lawman

    Liked by 1 person

    1. ShamrockOneFive says:

      Thanks!

      It does feel a bit pricey at first, especially with a lot of people having bought IL-2: 1946 at the end of the cycle where you ended up with 120+ aircraft for about $10 and War Thunder giving you most of the planes for free (though some of the Premium WT planes are pricey too!).

      IL-2: BoS/BoM fit right in the middle between WT/original IL-2 and DCS for price. DCS is $40 for the Spitfire and $50 and more for some other planes. Here, for $50-60 you’re getting 8-10 planes plus all of the maps, campaigns, ground objects, etc. that fit thematically together.

      Its a bit pricey but on sale its really not too bad for the detail level that goes into each of these planes. Its far above what WT offers in each plane (individual aircraft systems are much more detailed).

      And… even if you get a Standard edition, the other planes still show up in your game. If you own BoM only, you’ll still see Heinkel He111s doing bombing attacks. If you own only BoS, you’ll see Bf110s, MiG-3s, I-16s and Ju88s from BoM too. You just can’t fly them unless you own the whole product.

      So its a bit limiting… but its not too bad on the whole.

      If you are a Call of Duty fan and buy CoD + Season Pass it’ll set you back about $120 a year. This is cheaper 🙂

      Like

      1. Lawman says:

        Well I guess you are right. So yesterday, I gave it a try and purchased the premium version with the 2 extra planes. I did that because War Thunder is getting more and more weird ( disappearing AI planes, super strong T34 85,… ).
        So I downloaded the game from a slow 1C server ( took about 2,5h for 6,5gb ), activated it and started the game. Well I tried because for some reasons, I simply cant connect to the master server. I contacted the support 2x but they did not reply, I tried connecting and connecting, checked FAQ, checked my online profile, waited over 8 hours in small hope, they have to “activate” the game too ( and not only in my profile where its already been activated ) but nothing.
        So I contacted the support again to deactivate my copy of the game and refund me the money because and you know what, now I got some answer.

        So long story short, I just want you to see some other problems with the game. Maybe ill give it a try in a few month when everything works properly, but for now on, I just focus watching them on stream ( or do some IL-2 CoD ).

        Like

  6. Lawman says:

    I guess you can delete this and my last posting: support contacted me, they fixed the problem, everything works now!

    Like

    1. ShamrockOneFive says:

      Glad to hear its all working! From the forums the vast majority of players are not having any problems at all, however, computer systems are never 100%. Always room for a small issue. I’ve had some problems with Battlefield 1 and that’s a “triple A” title from a dev studio numbering in the hundreds and a 24 hour support team from EA. 1CGS is 23 guys with one support person who sleeps sometimes 🙂

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s